Comment on ‘‘Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance’’ by S. McIntyre and R. McKitrick
نویسنده
چکیده
[1] McIntyre and McKitrick [2005] (hereinafter referred to as MM05) point out a bias in the Mann et al. [1998] (hereinafter referred to as MBH98) Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstruction, one tending to enhance trends during the last century. Having reproduced the statistical results of MM05, this comment is prompted by further questions regarding appropriate implementation of principal component analysis (PCA) and the presence of discrepancies in their estimate of significance levels. [2] MBH98 use principal component analysis (PCA) to distill the large number of tree ring records (90% of the total 415 proxy records) into a smaller number of principal components (PCs). MM05 focus on a subset of the data, the seventy North American tree ring records (NOAMER) extending back to AD1400, and show that the MBH98 normalization leads to biases in the leading principal component (PC1). It is in this same step that MM05 use a questionable normalization procedure, making it useful to describe the various normalization conventions in detail. [3] The MBH98 normalization convention for a record, x, is xMBH = (x ! x1902)/s1902, where x1902 and s1902 are the mean and standard deviation computed between 1902 and 1980. MBH98 compute the standard deviation after detrending x, indicated as s0, an additional step that seems questionable but turns out not to influence the results. Because proxy records span different intervals, it is impossible to both normalize records over a fixed interval and ensure that records are zero-mean over their entire duration. MBH98 presumably chose the 1902 to 1980 normalization period because almost all records span this interval, but which MM05 point out leads to a bias in the results. [4] The reason for the bias in the MBH98 PC1 can be understood by considering that PCA maximizes the variance described by each principal component where variance is measured as the sum of the squared record, s = X
منابع مشابه
Reply to Ammann and Wahl: “comment on “hockey Sticks, Principal Components and Spurious Significance”
متن کامل
Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance
[1] The ‘‘hockey stick’’ shaped temperature reconstruction of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) has been widely applied. However it has not been previously noted in print that, prior to their principal components (PCs) analysis on tree ring networks, they carried out an unusual data transformation which strongly affects the resulting PCs. Their method, when tested on persistent red noise, nearly always ...
متن کاملReply to comment by von Storch and Zorita on ‘‘Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance’’
[1] Von Storch and Zorita [2005] (hereinafter referred to as VZ) concur that the Mann et al. [1998] (hereinafter referred to as MBH98) principal component (PC) method ‘‘very often shows a hockey stick shaped pattern even if the data was by construction free of such structures’’ the Artificial Hockey Stick (AHS) effect. We did not claim that the AHS effect applied to all situations. We did claim...
متن کاملReply to comment by Huybers on ‘‘Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance’’
[1] McIntyre and McKitrick [2005a] (hereinafter referred to as MM05) showed that the actual Mann et al. [1998] (hereinafter referred to as MBH98) PC method used an unreported short-centering method, which was biased towards producing a hockey stick shaped PC1 with an inflated eigenvalue. Huybers [2005] concurs with these particular findings, but argues that we ‘‘exaggerated’’ the MBH98 bias by ...
متن کاملREPLY TO "Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcings over the past six centuries: A comment." By S. McIntyre and R. McKitrick
McIntyre and McKitrick (1) (henceforth MM04) are incorrect with respect to each major point they raise, including those concerning the main data sets we used and the principal components algorithm with which we condensed proxy data in heavily represented regions. Contrary to the assertions of MM04, we here demonstrate our original reconstruction (2) is statistically robust and their criticisms ...
متن کامل